8.13.2009

Style

We’re still digging and I’m still waiting for a USB cord for the camera. Ergo, I have no news to report and frankly, digging is very boring.

So, I’ve started thinking ahead. Lately, I’ve been considering the style of the house. Most homes have a known style (Cape Cod, Ranch, Queen Anne, Bungalow) and I’d really like to give our house a uniformity of style itself. I’ve never been in favor of trying to be something you ain’t, so as much as I love Frank Lloyd Wright I will not try to convince anyone that my house is Fallingwater.

I explored the interweb and found a wonderful resource by Dr. Tom Paradis, an associate professor at Northern Arizona University, who says I may use his pictures as long as I tell you that they’re his. So, thank you Dr. P., creator of http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~twp/architecture/

I started my research knowing that this house was built in 1905 as a simple two-room, two-story structure. I knew that the outside walls that end in ‘points’ on top are called the ‘gable walls’. I knew we now had an L-shaped design. I knew that in 1905, my area was a tiny farm town known for simple country folk, not stylish modern architecture. And I knew from neighbors that some previous folks living here had done things like growing gardens and painting the house and the garage/barn the same garish cranberry color inside and out. I decided to only strongly consider those styles that were popular way before 1905 up through maybe 1910. I figured whatever I found, ours would be a simplistic version—not state of the art.

I finished my research having learned that the ‘pointiness’ of gable walls is a big factor in classifying American styles. Also, adding a lot of multi-dimensional stuff significantly changes the style. Here’s our house:


What is now the right half of the house used to be the whole house. There’s a gable wall around the corner of the right side and the used to be (of course) a gable wall around the left side. I suspect this is based on the Early Colonial style, which is actually no style at all. Folks simply built a shelter whether in Virginia in the 1700s or Oklahoma in the 1800s. While this house was built in 1905, it doesn’t appear to have been designed by anyone desiring more than a roofs and four walls.


In later colonial periods (when America had more cash for its government buildings, and Americans had more cash for their homes), some of these other familiar styles popped up among the stylish. The Federal Style (1780-1850) and Greek Revival (1800-1855) are very similar and noted for their columns and wide gable front pieces. (Think of the Parthenon, Lincoln Memorial, NY Public Library, College of William & Mary.) The other major revival in American architecture was the Gothic revival (1840-1880). These buildings are known for their “Steeply pitched roof” and arches (think church steeples, medieval cathedrals, Chicago’s Tribune Tower.)

Both Greek and Gothic are stately and beautiful, and neither resembles our home, mostly because both rely heavily on their gables (low vs. steep) for their style. Our gables are medium and simple—'farmhousy'. So, I continued my search.

The Victorian era boasts a greater variety of styles than I had thought. The Victorian house that popped into your head just now is probably a Queen Anne (1880s-1905.) Often, when a town is described as having many “quaint Victorian houses,” it means Queen Annes which are known for their many different roofs, dormers, porches, gables, even a turret or two. Another distinct Victorian style is the Second Empire (1860s-1880s) known for its Mansard roof. This is a roof unlike any other: it has a flat top, like the Italian style, but the uppermost floor of the house has exterior walls that lean slightly inward and are covered in roofing materials, not siding. It’s very odd.

At this point in my journey, I had reached the 20th century and still no style for my little house! I know it’s not the product of a single architect sitting down at his drawing board and creating a piece of art. It’s a mish-mosh of skilled and unskilled additions and “improvements” from 1905 to today! How could I possibly give it any kind of uniformity? But, you know, just because a house isn’t the work of a real architect, doesn’t mean it’s style-less. Here is Dr. Paradis’s narrative on what was happening from town to town from 1880-1910:

The spread of Folk Victorian (and other late 19th century styles) was made possible by railroads expanding into smaller towns and cities. Mass-produced wood features could be transported quickly and cheaply almost anywhere. Home builders often simply added trim and ornament to traditional folk houses. Older folk homes were often updated with new ornamentation, now available everywhere due to pattern books and mass production and sale of wood features. A very common style found in turn-of-the-century western towns settled during that time.”

No, Delaware isn’t out west, but here’s something that actually made sense. These were homes built while Victorian houses were the fashion by homeowners who didn’t have the carpentry skills or the money to really go all Queen-Anne-Mansard-bling on it. So they improvised. These are the ‘Folk Victorians’: often L-shaped, with three gable ends, possibly a porch or two (or not), and whatever little Victorian details and trim could be squeezed in. Ours doesn’t have the detail work that the following two examples do, but the potential is definitely there.

Welcome to our Busted Folk Victorian Farmhouse!

For more insight visit Dr. Paradis’s site (all pictures except the very first one are his. Nearly all wisdom is as well.)

Also, check out Dave Taylor’s Victorian house site for more styles, details, and cool pictures.

No comments:

Post a Comment